Solidity Smart Contract Development in Bangalore

Custom Solidity smart contracts: ERC-20 tokens, NFTs, DeFi logic, and protocol contracts. We treat every contract as a public attack surface, because it is. Fuzz tested, internally audited, and mainnet-deployed with verification.

EVM + Solana

Chain support

Foundry + Echidna

Fuzz testing

OpenZeppelin

Battle-tested base

NatSpec

Full documentation

Security-first design

Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern, reentrancy guards, minimal privilege, and pull-over-push payment patterns are non-negotiable in every contract.

Third-party audit recommended

For contracts handling significant user value, we strongly recommend and facilitate third-party audits from firms like Trail of Bits, ConsenSys Diligence, or OpenZeppelin.

Fuzz testing coverage

Foundry invariant tests and Echidna property-based fuzzing catch edge cases that hand-written unit tests miss, particularly for mathematical operations and state transitions.

Upgradeable when needed

Transparent proxy or UUPS patterns for upgradeable contracts; immutable deployment for trust-minimised contracts where upgradeability is a liability.

Gas-optimised by default

Storage packing, event vs. storage trade-offs, batch operations, and unchecked arithmetic where safe, gas costs are a user experience consideration.

Full NatSpec docs

Every public and external function documented with NatSpec, readable developer documentation generated automatically from inline annotations.

Languages

  • Solidity
  • Vyper
  • Yul / Assembly
  • JavaScript
  • TypeScript
  • Python

Frameworks

  • Hardhat
  • Foundry
  • Truffle
  • Brownie
  • Tenderly
  • Remix IDE

Libraries

  • OpenZeppelin
  • Chainlink
  • Safe Contracts
  • Gnosis Safe
  • Uniswap V3 SDK
  • Compound

Testing

  • Hardhat chai matchers
  • Forge test
  • Slither
  • Echidna
  • MythX
  • Certora

Client SDKs

  • ethers.js
  • viem
  • web3.js
  • Alchemy SDK
  • Moralis
  • The Graph

Chains

  • Ethereum
  • Polygon
  • Base
  • Arbitrum
  • Optimism
  • BNB Chain

  1. 01

    Spec & Threat Modelling

    2–3 days

    Contract specification with precise state machines, access control design, attack surface analysis, and economic security modelling before a line of Solidity is written.

  2. 02

    Architecture Review

    1 day

    Upgrade strategy (proxy pattern selection), storage layout planning, cross-contract call flow, and gas estimation for key operations.

  3. 03

    Development

    1–3 weeks

    Solidity implementation following Checks-Effects-Interactions, minimal attack surface, OpenZeppelin base contracts, and NatSpec documentation inline.

  4. 04

    Testing

    1–2 weeks

    Unit tests, fork tests against mainnet state, fuzz testing with Echidna/Foundry, and static analysis with Slither covering all critical paths and edge cases.

  5. 05

    Internal Audit

    2–4 days

    Manual security review against OWASP SWC registry, reentrancy analysis, access control review, and arithmetic overflow checks.

  6. 06

    Mainnet Deployment

    1 day

    Deterministic deployment with CREATE2 where applicable, constructor argument verification, block explorer verification, and post-deployment smoke tests.

Frontend

  • Next.js App Router
  • React 18+
  • Tailwind CSS
  • Core Web Vitals tuning

Backend & data

  • Node.js / Python APIs
  • PostgreSQL
  • Redis caching
  • REST & GraphQL

Operations

  • CI/CD pipelines
  • Docker / Kubernetes
  • Observability
  • Security hardening

01

Architecture mapping

Dependencies, API contracts, compliance constraints, and performance budgets documented before sprint one.

02

Secure sprints

Two-week increments with GitHub access, demo recordings, and QA checkpoints, client visibility at every stage.

03

QA & handover

Automated tests on critical paths, security review, runbooks, and knowledge transfer to your team.

DAO tooling startup

Challenge
ERC-20 voting hooks lacked cap checks and timelock on admin pause.
Simplileap solution
OpenZeppelin patterns, Slither/Mythril, and audit documentation pack.
Outcome
External audit: zero critical findings post-fix.
Read full case study ›

Retail loyalty consortium

Challenge
Reward minting required multisig upgrades and metadata pinning.
Simplileap solution
ERC-1155 contracts, Timelock, and IPFS + CDN fallback.
Outcome
48k wallets minted; external audit passed.
Read full case study ›

Currency

Package

Smart contract development

Ideal for

Token & governance projects

Investment

₹3L – ₹10L

Includes

  • Solidity / Hardhat
  • OpenZeppelin patterns
  • Audit prep
  • Testnet + mainnet deploy

Package

DApp / Web3 product

Ideal for

Full-stack Web3

Investment

₹10L – ₹30L

Includes

  • Smart contracts
  • dApp frontend
  • Wallet connect
  • Indexer integration

Package

Audit documentation pack

Ideal for

Pre-audit teams

Investment

Scoped add-on

Includes

  • Slither / Mythril
  • Test coverage expansion
  • Access control review
  • External audit liaison
Harsha ParthasarathyKeshav Sharma

Company and Service positioning is reviewed for production delivery standards by Harsha Parthasarathy (Co-Founder, Strategy & Operations 24+ years IT veteran, IBM, Global Delivery, Program Management) and Keshav Sharma (Co-Founder, Engineering and Lead Architect, Full-stack engineering, product delivery and technical standards).

Verified entity

Simplileap Digital LLP

LLPIN

AAU-8582

Startup India

DIPP83124

Founded

November 2020

Office

Residency Rd, Bengaluru, India

Common questions about smart contract development

A single contract type (e.g. ERC-20 token with custom vesting schedule) is our minimum scope. We do not implement contracts without a full specification phase, undefined requirements produce insecure contracts.

Yes, strongly, for any contract handling user funds. We conduct internal reviews as part of our process, but they do not substitute for specialist third-party audit firms. We can introduce you to firms we trust.

If the contract was deployed with a proxy pattern (Transparent or UUPS), yes. Immutable contracts cannot be changed by design, which is sometimes the correct security posture. We design upgrade strategies intentionally upfront.

All EVM-compatible chains, Ethereum mainnet, Polygon, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, and BNB Chain. For high-value deployments, we recommend Ethereum L1 or audited L2s.

Storage layout review (packing variables to minimise slots), replacing storage reads with events where read is not needed on-chain, using immutable variables, batch functions, and unchecked arithmetic in proven-safe loops.

Ready to build production-grade contracts?

Tell us what you're working on. A senior lead, not a sales rep, replies within one business day.